欢迎访问云南西力生物技术股份有限公司!证券代码:871574
首页 成 果 源于西力产品的客户论文
Comparison of Two Exploratory Data Analysis Methods for Classification of Phyllanthus Chemical Fingerprint: Unsupervised vs. Supervised Pattern Recognition Technologies. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2015, 407: 1389–1401.
发布时间:2015-06-19 阅读数:1432 来源:Anal. Bioanal. Chem.
分享到:

Abstract:

In this study, unsupervised and supervised classification methods were compared for comprehensive analysis of the fingerprints of 26 Phyllanthus samples from different geographical regions and species. A total of 63 compounds were identified and tentatively assigned structures for the establishment of fingerprints using high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC/TOFMS). Unsupervised and supervised pattern recognition technologies including principal component analysis (PCA), nearest neighbors algorithm(NN), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and artificial neural network (ANN) were employed. Results showed that Phyllanthus could be correctly classified according to their geographical locations and species through ANN and PLS-DA. Important variables for clusters discrimination were also identified by PCA. Although unsupervised and supervised pattern recognitions have their own disadvantage and application scope, they are effective and reliable for studying fingerprints of traditional Chinese medicines (TCM). These two technologies are complementary and can be superimposed. Our study is the first holistic comparison of supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition technologies in the TCM chemical fingerprinting. They showed advantages in sample classification and data mining, respectively.


ewm.jpg 微信公众号
11.jpg 移动官网
特别声明:禁止在未经同意情况下转载本网站信息,BioBioPha品牌产品均由西力生物独家生产与销售,仅用于科学研究或企业研发!
版权所有 2019-2024 云南西力生物技术股份有限公司 BioBioPha 滇ICP备09000810号-1滇公安备案号 53019002000069号
技术支持:奥远科技

联系客服